Abstract
This report does a Comparative Analysis of
different Financial Products of the Reliance Money company with its nearest
competitor and develops a Hypothesis for the same to check if there is any
advantage of Investment Avenue in Reliance Money.
1.
Equity: In Equity Trading, the nearest competitor of
Reliance Money is ICICI. The methodology employed for comparison is Factorial
Design (Two-way ANOVA) under Statistical Hypothesis.
Here, the Null Hypothesis (H01) is accepted
which states that Profits generated using Tips & Techniques of Reliance
Money in equity market are equal to the profits generated using Tips &
Techniques of ICICI Securities. It signifies an excellent performance of the
company in this competitive market.
2.
Mutual Funds: In Mutual Funds, the nearest
competitor of Reliance is ICICI Prudential. The methodology employed for
comparison is Factorial Design (Two-way ANOVA) under Statistical Hypothesis.
Here the Null Hypothesis (H02) is
accepted which states that Returns from investment in Mutual Funds of Reliance
Securities is greater than the returns from investment in Mutual Funds of ICICI
Prudential in fluctuating market scenario.
Also using Multiple Regression, we
find out that Sharpe ratio is the most important parameter for observing
Expected Returns. Higher the Sharpe Ratio Better would be the expected returns.
Thus, for sure Reliance Money enjoys a
competitive advantage over its rivals as it provides cheap & superior
services to its investors in addition to customer satisfaction and better
returns.
3.
Insurance: In Insurance schemes, the nearest competitors
of Reliance are TATA and LIC. The methodology employed for comparison is
Chi-Square Test of Independence under Statistical Hypothesis.
Here, the Null Hypothesis (H01) is accepted
which states that Investment tendency of customers in Insurance is independent
of company. A Low value of Contingency Coefficient (C=0.0000575) which measures
the strength of Association further verifies the Independence.
When Product Differentiation is taken into account, the result is again the same.
Copyright © 2023 IJRTS Publications. All Rights Reserved | Developed By iNet Business Hub